Your initial discussion post should be made by WEDNESDAY. You must make your own initial post before you will be able to see other students’ responses. For this discussion, we will look at the proper use of quoting and paraphrasing. No more than 15-20% of your final paper ought to include source support, but how you use that source support is very important. For this discussion, please review the information on pages 84-92. Next, complete this week’s discussion, as follows. For your main post, using Thomas Lord’s essay “What? I Failed? But I Paid for Those Credits! Problems of Students Evaluating Faculty” (pages 93-97), answer the questions below. Please note that for this main post, you should avoid any use of signal phrases (attribution tags–see page 84)). While these can be useful in writing your research, the overuse of this practice takes away from your ability to have a voice in the paper. For the two peer posts, due before Sunday but posted on two different days from the main post and each other, explore your peers’ work and help them determine whether they have accurately quoted and paraphrased material from Lord’s writing. Also determine whether the citations and reference entries are correct. For the discussion, do the following: 1. Create a substantially revised paraphrase from Lord’s essay. Be sure to include a properly formatted APA citation. (minimum WC: 50) 2. Create the reference entry for your citation material. 3. Create an integrated quote using Lord’s essay. Be sure to include proper citation. (minimum WC: 50)

Substantially Revised Paraphrase

The lord’s essay can be described as a literature that is capable of assessing the higher learning as a strategy that fails to push through learning as well as its economic achievements usually are given a more significant standard together with the academic routine. However, to keep the policy of the customer’s fulfillment, the quality along with the laws of learning turns not possible due to the raising in social engagements (Lord, & Baviskar, 2007, pp. 117). Other than paying for the marks and grades, students have developed a strategy of intimidating lecturers and professors through giving them biased evaluation.

Reference Entry

Lord, T., & Baviskar, S. (2007). Moving students from information recitation to information understanding: exploiting Bloom’s taxonomy in creating science questions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 40.

Integrated Quote

The decrease in ethics and quality in higher education is typically linked with the commercialization of the learning procedures and other important considerations. The learners are expected to pay for the school fees, and this should be seen in their results and grades they produce as there us proportional of quality together with the cost. The education system has initiated the business philosophy where the user is considered to be all time right as outlined on the lecturer’s ratings from the learners. The student leadership together with their locations within the society has emerged as another threatening factor to professors who reduces their teaching standards (Lord & Baviskar, 2007, pp. 121). There is also the summer study that is regarded as a rapid education that several schools have initiated in their learning plans.