USA: +1 (725) 712-1730 
Sign in
done to correct it. Ethics Case BYP1-7 After numerous campus interviews, Travis Chase, a senior at Great Northern College, received two office interview invitations from the Baltimore offices of two large firms. Both firms offered to cover his out-of-pocket expenses (travel, hotel, and meals). He scheduled the interviews for both firms on the same day, one in the morning and one in the afternoon. At the conclusion of each interview,he
Expert Answer
1. At the outset, Travis has made only one trip & his actual out-of-pocket expenditure is only one $ 296.
2. Knowingly getting reimbursed for the same amount from 2 firms ,is blatant violation of ethics ,all the more when an un-suspecting other party is made to believe a lie.
3. Travis cannot justify himself ,on any count , as he is well aware of the facts– having combined with malafide intentions ,strongly believing that neither firm has any scope to suspect.
4. This belief of Travis is the psychological assertion to support his appropriate-approach justification.
Travis is ethically & morally wrong , even though he may be correct in claiming as per the firms’ independent offer to reimburse the out-of-pocket expenses of the candidates ,attending the scheduled interviews— without even enquiring whether the candidates have come on any other mission ,to their geographical location.
