(5 points) ) ,In some foreign countries, the tax law specifically designates the types of income items that are e in gross income. How does this approach compare with the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (S 61)? major advantage to the approach used in the U.S. tax law?
U .S . Internal Revenue jurisprudence (61The types of income used to observe imposees paid in some countries is a limited listIn the mature together States the types of income that can be levyed is defined by U .S . InternalRevenue Code (61).
This approach is a major advantage in the get together StatesThe types of income that are defined as make income in the unify States is Exceptas otherwise provided in this subtitle , megascopic income means on the whole income from whateversource derived , including (but non limited to ) the succeeding(a) items (1 Compensation forservices , including fees , commissions , fringe benefits , and correspondent items (2 ) Grossincome derived from business (3 ) Gains derived from dealings in property (4 ) Interest (5 ) Rents (6 ) Royalties (7 ) Dividends (8 ) sustenance and separate maintenance payments (9 ) Annuities (10 ) Income from behavior insurance and endowment contracts (11 ) Pensions (12 ) Income from shift of indebtedness (13 ) Distributive mete out of partnership grossincome (14 ) Income in obeisance of a decedent and (15 ) Income from an evoke in anestate or trustfulness (CornellThe advantage to Code 61 is in the definition of income . This vast definitionprovides a larger measure base for the coupled States to tax . The definition of what is income isthe foundation of the United States tax law . The write in code should not be looked at as a fix-all to both tax code . This code only enables the United States t! o perplex to suck taxes onthe defined sources of incomeIn many.